REST API vs gRPC vs GraphQL
Modern systems rarely use a single communication protocol everywhere.
Most scalable architectures combine multiple approaches depending on:
- client needs
- performance requirements
- internal vs external traffic
- developer experience
- realtime capability
- data flexibility
This guide compares:
- REST API
- gRPC
- GraphQL
Quick Comparison
| Feature | REST API | gRPC | GraphQL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protocol | HTTP/1.1 or HTTP/2 | HTTP/2 | HTTP |
| Data Format | JSON | Protobuf (binary) | JSON |
| Performance | Medium | Very Fast | Medium |
| Type Safety | Weak/Optional | Strong | Strong |
| Streaming | Limited | Excellent | Possible with subscriptions |
| Browser Friendly | Excellent | Limited | Excellent |
| Learning Curve | Easy | Medium | Medium/Hard |
| Best For | Public APIs | Internal microservices | Flexible frontend APIs |
| Over-fetching | Common | Minimal | Solved |
| Under-fetching | Common | Minimal | Solved |
| Schema Contract | Optional | Required | Required |
| Mobile Efficiency | Medium | Excellent | Good |
| Human Readable | Yes | No | Yes |
| Tooling Ecosystem | Massive | Strong backend tooling | Strong frontend tooling |
REST API
What is REST?
REST (Representational State Transfer) is the traditional HTTP API architecture.
Resources are exposed through endpoints:
GET /users/123
POST /orders
PUT /profile
DELETE /cart/1
Rule of Thumb
Use REST when:
- simplicity matters most
- building public APIs
- CRUD dominates
- broad compatibility is required
⸻
Use gRPC when:
- performance is critical
- services communicate internally
- low latency matters
- strong contracts are important
⸻
Use GraphQL when:
- frontend flexibility matters
- multiple clients need different data
- reducing API roundtrips is important
- building complex UI systems